The MDC’s decision to attend Parliament
There has been considerable controversy surrounding the MDC’s decision to have its 41 elected members of Parliament sworn in and participate in Parliament. A variety of criticisms have been made but most focus on arguments that the decision is a betrayal of those losing MDC candidates who had their seats stolen from them by ZANU (PF) and that the presence of MDC MPs in Parliament legitimises the entire election, ZANU (PF)’s rule and the new Parliament itself.
At the outset let me state that most of us in the MDC understood that the elections would be rigged and that there was very little prospect of us winning. Indeed when we announced our decision to participate we said we would do so under protest and that was because we understood that the playing field was warped and that ZANU (PF) would use every trick in the book to deny the people of Zimbabwe the right to choose candidates of their choice. Whilst some in the MDC were carried away by the huge crowds who attended our rallies, especially in the last two weeks of the campaign, many of us continued to say both privately and publicly in campaign rallies (and to the media) that the elections would be rigged.
In the Sunday Telegraph of the 20th of March 2005 I was quoted extensively in an article entitled “Zimbabwe election has no chance of being fair”. Part of the article reads: “he also suspected that ZANU PF would simply announce the results in its favour, regardless of the votes cast… they have all the machinery in place to rig it… the big question isn’t if they will do it, but how they will do it”. I and others in the MDC were under no illusions. If you ask anyone who attended any of my rallies they will tell you that I had repeatedly said that Mugabe would not allow us to win and that the election should be seen as part of a process not an event.